[an error occurred while processing this directive] Religious Education
TOPIC: Ethics/Social Justice
AGE: 14-18 years, Gr. 9-12
A Moral What?
by Justin Whitaker, Fall 2001 issue of Synapse, a
newspaper for Unitarian Universalist youth.
We live in a society that has lost its morals to the daily
attractions of political manipulation. We live in a society
that has lost sight of the democratic process, and has now
begun to use its democratic theories to push corporations,
political capitalism, consumerism, and consumption into our
schools and our media. Now those theories have begun to permeate
into all tiers of our society. But as ethernet and internet
cables carry these theories throughout our planet and into
our skyscrapers and business proposals, the earth’s
population seems to be screaming at me to buy and sell. Get
this toothbrush that can be used once and then thrown away!
The undertone whispers in my ear to pack everything in its
own plastic container to ensure cleanliness, completely depleting
our environment at the same time. As all this chaos plagues
my thoughts and eats away at my morals, there is a voice that
calls me. It calls with a voice that is pleasant to my ears
and calls my name. This voice is embodied by the Unitarian
Universalist Association. As a minority in the battle for
responsible consumption, we must stand as a creator of change,
we must do our best to stand tall and respond strong to our
moral imperative.
A Moral What?
It is an imperative. It is our obligation to respond. Webster
defines imperative as one issue not to be evaded, peremptory.
These are words that leave us no option. They provide us with
no choice in our actions; but rather they require something
of us. They call for an imperative. It is something that we
must act on now, but how can we do it? Where do we start?
How can we act on this imperative? First question: Do we act
on issues within our own control or do we address the problem
in our community and society? I advocate that change must
originate from within. For example, the one time I attended
a UUA Board of Trustees meeting my colleagues and I were provided
with boxed lunches courtesy of the UUA. Inside of the box
everything was wrapped in plastic wrap, and under that wrap
each dish was in its own plastic container. I’m sure
that either one of these protective coverings would have been
sufficient on its own. Nonetheless, two salads, a sandwich,
and a fruit bowl all were wrapped separately. My guess is
that the 10 lunches provided used near enough plastic to make
a rain parka for a homeless person in the Pacific Northwest,
and maybe even a matching hat.
It’s an imperative. Think about it. Think about the
last piece of trash that you threw away, and then think about
if there had been a better option for that “trash.”
I think about it everyday. In fact, the rough draft of this
essay was on the back of an old report I wrote. But does that
make me some sort of Super Moral Responsible Consumer, simply
because I take notes on recycled paper? Am I now the almighty
moral consumer? No. Never. Why? Because the word imperative
has implications much larger than our actions. By adopting
this goal as an imperative, we must do our best to overcome
decades of poor teachings, thoughtless actions, and societal
degradation on the part of the education system, the government,
and the media. Where can we go to change the big things, the
mindset that creates irresponsible consumption? How do we
affect the way a person thinks?
Philosopher Martin Heidegger asked the same questions when
he examined the way people think. He classified thoughts into
two types of thinking, calculative and meditative. It is calculative
thoughts that dominate our society, that calculates constant
addition and use, construction of one thing to the next without
analyzing the effects. Calculative thinking promotes incessant
use of products simply because we have them, but not necessarily
because we need them. Meditative thinking contrasts the calculative
theories. Meditative thoughts are content with the current
status, or often promote a digression to a previous societal
state. Most important, meditative thoughts promote analysis
and understanding of overall implications prior to action.
It is this mindset that must be sought. The mindset that Heidegger
promoted is the one that we must attempt to create throughout
our society.
In 1997, John Berger, author of Charging Ahead and
analyst of the U.S. energy grid, predicted a forthcoming energy
crisis. California is currently experiencing this crisis.
In this millennium things are no different from what was written
in the original “Study Action Issue”: “We
are [still] caught up in a consumption treadmill that is morally
questionable and that is not sustainable...” Although
our nation has been struggling to improve this condition,
I feel as though we have only further entrenched ourselves
into the crisis. This crisis is one that also must be addressed
by our imperative. It is our role as Unitarian Universalists
to take our imperative to an international community. Whether
through the WTO or through day-to-day use of CFCs and aerosol
cans, our environment is being destroyed. Our consumption
has reached levels that are no longer acceptable. What can
we do? Where can we go? How can we take our imperative to
an international level? These are the questions that must
be answered, these are the imperative questions.
It is the calling of our culture, it is the calling of my
religion, and it is the calling of my morals to step up to
our imperatives. We must understand the implications of our
goals, we must remember that the value of starting our efforts
with ourselves and our own actions, in no way can compare
with the value of ending our efforts on a global scale. We
must remember that we have agreed to take this issue as an
imperative. By embodying this imperative through both social
and mental changes, we will achieve our goal. We will answer
to our morals and we will be able to answer to our moral imperative--our
imperative of responsible consumption.
Justin Whitaker is currently living in the Portland, OR
area.
Last updated June 12, 2005
|